Career Center >> Career Groups: Can We Talk? >> Alternative Healthcare
Alternative Healthcare
| back to top |
Posted 3 months ago We recently posted this news article about a music therapist in a children's hospital. I seems that his patients respond well to this form of alternative therapy. Do you believe these forms of therapy are affective? As a healthcare provider, do you practice alternative therapies with patients? Georgia Price
|
| back to top |
| Posted 3 months ago I am not a healthcare provider (not yet!), however, I do believe that it is important for anyone working in the field of health care to keep an open mind to any and all kind of treatments or techniques available. Every individual and thereby every patient is unique such that their treatment may also be unique. Not everyone responds the same way to medicines and therapies regardless of their diagnosis, so a healthcare practitioner ought to be able to try different treatment plans with their patients until the appropriate one is defined. The people who think it cannot be done should not interrupt those who are doing it. --Chinese proverb |
| back to top |
| Posted 3 months ago I was a Certified Medical Assistant a few years ago, and I found during those years that sometimes alternative medicine, which includes nutritional supplements can be better, with less side effects. Music is a strong thing that moves people in ways even talking can't reach some, i.e., when a preacher is preaching, some people get more out of the worship music than that of the sermon. Not always is the case, but for some music can really move people. You can say the same thing about laughter. Even for a few moments it will get the patient to stop thinking their sitiuation, and joke around with the doctor or nurse. I used to work with a doctor who liked Abbott and Costello's "Who's on First?", so I would kid him about it (sometimes did some of the routine right in front of the patients), especially while having an EKG performed. If you can put a smile upon someone's face during your working day, it's alll worthwhile.
|
| back to top |
| Posted 3 months ago I am a Licensed Massage Therapist and there is accepted research that proves the benefits of massage for all patients. Healing occurs faster, stress levels are reduced, and specific side effects of certain treatments are reduced. Those are only a few of the many benefits but the greatest benefit is that any type of treatment which makes a patient feel better emotionally, physically, and spiritually is worth it. Music, laughter, massage, Healing Touch, etc. I am a firm believer of combining traditional western medicine with 'complimentary' forms of healthcare. Afterall, the goal for all healthcare professionals is to help the patient feel better and regain their health. |
| back to top |
| Posted 3 months ago I agree with you Tricia Ann. The chemicals that the medical and other doctors give patients only help with the symptoms rather than the cure. There are natural methods, along with vitamin supplements that can also help. I'm a firm believer that people years back and I mean in the early Common Era would take the person and treat the whole person, not just what was ailing him/her. When you think about it, what about the extra stress that is place on someone when they find out that they have something -- whether it is high blood pressure, a disease where there is not a cure, or those who have anxiety problems. Massage and music therapy can help much better than most medicines to reduce the stress. I've seen biofeedback work on patients in accidents. People have undergone acupuncture and they say that it really does work. Where I worked there were a couple of doctors that were hooked up with the cardiology office and they dispensed vitamins. Wow! Who would have thought replacing regular meds with vitamin supplements and other things like fish oil?!
|
| back to top |
| Posted about 1 month ago Applying Science to Alternative Medicine More than 80 million adults in the United States are estimated to use some form of alternative medicine, from herbs and megavitamins to yoga and acupuncture. But while sweeping claims are made for these treatments, the scientific evidence for them often lags far behind: studies and clinical trials, when they exist at all, can be shoddy in design and too small to yield reliable insights. Now the federal government is working hard to raise the standards of evidence, seeking to distinguish between what is effective, useless and harmful or even dangerous. “The research has been making steady progress,” said Dr. Josephine P. Briggs, director of the National Center for Complementary and Alternative Medicine, a division of the National Institute of Health. “It’s reasonably new that rigorous methods are being used to study these health practices.” The need for rigor can be striking. For instance, a 2004 Harvard study identified 181 research papers on yoga therapy reporting that it could be used to treat an impressive array of ailments — including asthma, heart disease, hypertension, depression, back pain, bronchitis, dabtes, cancer, arthritis, insomnia, lung disease, and high blood pressure. It turned out that only 40 percent of the studies used randomized controlled trials — the usual way of establishing reliable knowledge about whether a drug, diet or other intervention is really safe and effective. In such trials, scientists randomly assign patients to treatment or control groups with the aim of eliminating bias from clinician and patient decisions. Sat Bir S. Khalsa, the study’s author and a sleep researcher at the Harvard Medical School, said an added complication was that “the vast majority of these studies have been small,” averaging 30 or fewer subjects per arm of the randomized trial. The smaller the sample size, he warned, the greater the risk of error, including false positives and false negatives. Critics of alternative medicine have seized on that weakness. R. Barker Bausell, a senior research methodologist at the University of Maryland and the author of “Snake Oil Science” (Oxford, 2007), says small studies often have a built-in conflict of interest: they need to show positive results to win grants for larger investigations. “All these things conspire to produce false positives,” Dr. Bausell said in an interview. “They make the results extremely questionable.” That kind of fog is what Dr. Briggs and the National Center for Complementary and Alternative Medicine, with a budget of $122 million this year, are trying to eliminate. Their trials tend to be longer and larger. And if a treatment shows promise, the center extends the trials to many centers, further lowering the odds of false positives and investigator bias. For instance, the center is conducting a large study to see if extracts from the ginkgo biloba tree can slow the progression of Alzheimer's disease. The clinical trials involve centers in California, Maryland, North Carolina and Pennsylvania and recruited more than 3,000 patients, all of them over 75. The study is to end next year. Another large study enrolled 570 participants to see if acupuncture provided pain relief and improved function for people with osteoarthritis of the knee. In 2004, it reported positive results. Dr. Brian M. Berman, the study’s director and a professor of medicine at the University of Maryland, said the inquiry “establishes that acupuncture is an effective complement to conventional arthritis treatment.” In an interview, Dr. Briggs said another good way to improve clinical trials was to ensure product uniformity, especially on herbal treatments. “We feel we have really influenced the standards,” she said. Over the years, laboratories have found that up to 75 percent of the samples of ginkgo biloba failed to show the claimed levels of the active ingredient. Scientists doing a clinical trial have a large incentive to fix that kind of inconsistency. Dr. Briggs said such investments would be likely to pay off in the future by documenting real benefits from at least some of the unorthodox treatments. “I believe that as the sensitivities of our measures improve, we’ll do a better job at detecting these modest but important effects” for disease prevention and healing, she said. An open question is how far the new wave will go. The high costs of good clinical trials, which can run to millions of dollars, means relatively few are done in the field of alternative therapies and relatively few of the extravagant claims are closely examined. “In tight funding times, that’s going to get worse,” said Dr. Khalsa of Harvard, who is doing a clinical trial on whether yoga can fight insomnia. “It’s a big problem. These grants are still very hard to get and the emphasis is still on conventional medicine, on the magic pill or procedure that’s going to take away all these diseases.” |
| back to top |
| Posted 22 days ago Beth Israel Medical Center in Manhattan is partnering with the Donna Karen Foundation to develop a cancer wing that focuses on more alternative ways of healing: namely yoga, meditation, and aromatherapy. Donna Karen has donated $850,000 to a yearlong experiment in combining Eastern and Western healing methods. This isn't just "touchy-feely" nonsense, though. There is a research component included: Ms. Karen hopes to prove that the "Urban Zen regime can reduce classic symptoms of cancer and it's treatment." So what do you think? Will these alternative treatments help? Should more hospitals adopt alternative treatments like this? Georgia Price
|
